USA Stretches The Facts In Objection To Motion For Summary Judgment

balance

In followup to my March 9th and 10th posts, Tucson-based assistant U.S. attorney Gerald Frank has responded to our opposition to the USA’s Motion for Summary Judgment. As has become the norm, Mr. Frank distorts the facts in his motion along with associated case law in order to justify summary judgment.

Read on for further discussion regarding Mr. Frank’s motion.
Continue reading “USA Stretches The Facts In Objection To Motion For Summary Judgment”